juliet was an idiot; or maybe it was just that she could think of no better way to get into romeo’s pants. moving as her sentiment was to romeo, it’s always kind of left me cold. clearly, neither juliet, nor romeo, nor the rose lived in a world where names are immortalized on a bristling battalion of credit and debit cards, diving licenses, voter’s id cards, ration cards, pan cards, passports and personalized cheque books. it’s evident that juliet never had to sign any payment receipts at the grocer’s or provide her name in block letters and in triplicate to the bank for a loan. lucky girl, juliet. at least her folks gave her a pretty name and let her keep it.
i'm certain that my folks love me better than juliet's loved her, but they just weren’t as sentimental about my name. i’ve borne it like a cross for the last 31 years and in this time believe it or not, it’s been worked over twice.
we moved a lot when i was at school and every one of the eleven establishments i went to (except the last one in tokyo) had a cleaning lady who went by my name. don’t get me wrong, i have no grouse with the cleaning staff. it's just that my name is a highly regarded attribute and extremely popular with the masses in india. in fact, some of the schools i went to were called my name, as were stationary stores, textbook supply shops and tuition classes. the point i am trying to make is that in all my growing years, my name was the absolute antithesis of ‘cool’ – that indefinable quality that sets the cheer leaders apart from the girls who captain debate clubs.
perhaps it was unfair on my part to blame the folks entirely for this debacle. my mum did tell me that she wanted to name me ‘nandita’ after her best friend from college when i cribbed to her all those years ago. “your name” she told me, “is entirely your grandfather’s fault. he wrote me a letter the week before you were born that informed me in no uncertain terms that his grandchild would be a girl, born on the eve of the goddess and that she would therefore bear her holy name.” my mother kept that letter and i have read it many times over. it never fails to leave me completely awestruck by my grandfather’s astrological precision and for some completely illogical reason, by myself, for arriving exactly as and when he'd specified i should. the name however, never ceased to be a sore point. and all i have managed to forgive my grandfather for is not insisting that i bear my grandmother’s even more impossibly unfashionable name as well.
i scrawled my despised first name and my crazily long last name across the front pages of all my notebooks and text books until i was thirteen. but when i wrote it in block letters on the cbsc board exam forms, my father inspected it and informed me i’d spelt my last name wrong. “there’s no ‘h’ in your last name” he said, “we pronounce the ‘h’ but we don’t spell it that way.” needless to say, i was absolutely astounded - “you mean you and mamma never noticed that’s how i spelt it all these years?” “no you didn’t!”, he said and pulled out all the notebooks and textbooks he’d painstakingly labeled for me. and then we compared the labels with all my scrawls across the front pages. that day i had to accept for the first time that i’d been spelling my name wrong all along.
i let go of the ‘h’ in my last name after that, and i missed it painfully at first. somehow, my last name looked a just a little bit sissy and lopsided without it. i felt that it lacked sibilance and personality, and that it just wasn't me. finally i came to terms with it by telling myself that my last name belonged to my dad and he had every right to spell it exactly the way he wanted. so when i began forming my signature on the back pages of my notebooks during the mindnumbing history and geography lessons, i decided i’d leave out my last name entirely and sign with just my first. sure i hated it, but i supposed that this part of my name at least, unquestionably belonged to me.
two years ago my folks called me at work and told me that the family astrologer had decreed my name was all wrong. “her numerological numbers add up to one and eight…very unlucky in a girl,” he’d told them, “making her too headstrong and independent…making her inflexible to marriage.” he concluded, striking below the belt. now my parents are sensible people. they are neither superstitious nor are they prone to melodramatic gestures. EXCEPT. except when it is pointed out that their perfect creation, the golden fruit of their loins and the glowing report card of their parental acumen is as yet, inexplicably unhitched. they used every dirty trick they knew after that. they pointed to every pitfall in my life and managed to link it to my ‘misspelled’ name, they threatened me and pleaded with me and bribed me and painted heady pictures of how my destiny would miraculously unfold...and finally promised to get off my back IF i’d agree to change my spelling again.
the astrologer’s prescription was ironic i think. he suggested that that i add an ‘h’ to my first name and that i just keep the initial of my last name and let go of the rest. this is just bloody hilarious i thought, as i inscribed my new name and signature 25 times each day for a month like he recommended. “no, this is just bloody stupid, you schmuck” said the voice in my head.
changing your name is a long and fiddly process. it involves gazette announcements and newspaper ads and never ending paperwork with the records departments at banks, employers, the passport office and all the other institutions that issue the myriad bits and pieces of your identity. i doubt i’d have swung it without my father’s dogged determination and singular skills with itemizing and crossing off lists. but finally, there i was with the missing ‘h’ back in my name and the controversial last name entirely knocked off.
did it rock my world? sure, i perpetually feel a little naked without my serpentine last name reassuringly trailing behind me. and every time i sign a document, the new ‘h’ feels like an uncouth hog elbowing me in my ribs to make space for himself. even after two years my ‘new’ name just doesn’t seem to fit at all. it still unsettles me and makes me look like a stranger on paper. and though i have often enough been accused of being a romantic, i find it difficult to concur with shakespeare on this matter of names. after all, i still tear up about a quarter of the cheques in my cheque book simply because i’ve misspelt mine. again.
ps: that was a very long blurt about me. you might enjoy this picture of colonel tatta singh more.
he is the only one i know with more reason than me to bitch about his name. however, as i have explained to him, there is little we can do about it, since his face really does look exactly like his balls.
Agentgreenglass grew up. And grew a lump. - This blog started because I was going through a phase of not knowing what I wanted to do with my life. And somewhere, along the way, as the blog g...
3 hours ago